Check the path Spro - IMG - MM-Purchasing - Subsequent (end of period rebate) settlement - Agreements - Maintain user groups for agreement type and business volume tolerance groups
Regards
KK
↧
Re: Where is the field status for the transaction MEB1 Création agreement ?
↧
Re: Goods Delivery and Goods-Receipt Based Invoice Verification In PO
Hello,
Thanks Jurgen and Prasoon for the reply. I have checked table LMF2 after Jurgen suggested but there is no entry in the table. Also i am using partner functions for ordering Address will that can be a issue.Also i will check with technical team for development issues.
Thanks
Sachin
↧
↧
Re: Can't export to Excel from MB5L?
As I can see you are in the screen of "Display Stocks(F12)"
Well, due to the SAP notes 1776721 and 2083705 the "old" options are not available. But you can try with the command &SELECT_SPREADSHEET, put it directly into the command field:
And you will be able to see the "old" options:
Regards.
NOTE: The command &SELECT_SPREADSHEET only works with simple lists.
↧
Re: Ariba Network Integration
Hi Nacho,
rapid-deployment solutions complement technical integration capabilities, like add-ons or adapters, they do not offer different technologies. Therefore, please use RDS together with add-ons or adapters, don't think of them in alternatives. For example, the Ariba Network Integration for SAP Business Suite RDS shows how to implement and configure the Ariba Network Integration for SAP Business Suite Add-On with step-by-step guidance. Just check it out: http://service.sap.com/public/rds-ariba.
↧
Re: Batch Managed Material Check
Hi Selva,
The OMCE settings is stored in table TCUCH-KZDCH.
0 Batch unique at plant level (MARC)
1 Batch unique at material level (MARA)
2 Batch unique at client level (MARA)
Since you can only select one level for batch unique, so you can either use MARA-XCHPF or MARC-XCHPF, not the two at the same time.
The difference between MARC-XCHAR and MARC-XCHPF has been explained by Jurgen.
You can check the following wiki on how to convert the batch unique level from client/material/plant.
FAQ during batch level conversion - Product Lifecycle Management - SCN Wiki
Best regards,
Tina
↧
↧
error: while doing MIGO, Material is currently blocked.
Hi,
while doing MIGO, error 'this material is currently blocked'.
I checked in the material master for plant material status in basic data, purchasing, mrp, costing views left blank and also physical inventory, vendor master as well
plz guide me.
↧
Re: error: while doing MIGO, Material is currently blocked.
Dear Ravinder,
Can you share the screen shot and error message number?
Regards,
Hermanto
↧
Re: ME59N Error Intimation through Email
Hi,
When running ME59N, do we have automatic error intimation set up to PR creator or Purchase group?
Regards,
Vengat
↧
Re: ME59N Error Intimation through Email
not really, but if you create separate ME59N jobs according to your criteria then you can send the spoolfile like explained in How to email output from Background Jobs
↧
↧
Re: Requirement for a pricing condition in a purchase contract
Requirements are possible in the purchasing pricing schema, just a F4 on that field would already have confirmed your question
Compare your setup with the content and very detailed explanation of OSS note 327220 - VOFM function and its objects
↧
Re: GR value is wrong
Can you replicate this case in your QA system?
I mean the program does not just randomly look into a table and take whatever it finds, you have the price information in the PO and in the invoice. Since you have no material SAP could not valuate the receipt with a standard price.
This KBA document explains as well that a KBS posting key uses always purchase order price: 1940213 - MIGO: Unable to post Account-Assigned Purchase Order Goods Receipt with Material's Standard Price
Maybe you could show your PO conditions if you net price is a result from various conditions
↧
Re: Batch Managed Material Check
Q1 = yes
Q2 = The plant information will be added to the batch master if the batch is used/posted in a plant. As your batch level is material level you have to look at MARA-XCHPF
The master record of a batch MCHA and MCH1 table has no effect on MARC-XCHPF, I mean it will not set this indicator in the material master, the material master is first.
Q3 = In general yes, but I would never do this irrespective of OMCE setting, a double check is always worth to do, as it can also uncover inconsistencies before something gets worse.
↧
Re: MIRO failing to block an invoice
Invoices with too low value will not be blocked for payment, if you go shopping and the cashier wants less money then you are happy too, you pay and keep calm, isn't it?
See KBA 1598731 - No payment block if the lower limit is exceeded during invoice posting - MM-IV
↧
↧
Re: STO PO not displayed in MD04 due to committed date
Hello
You have probably checked the flag "fixed quantity" for the PO item (it's the last field of the item line)
Take a look on notes 2038718,2063944 and check the F1 help of this field:
Delivery Date and Quantity Fixed
Indicates whether you want to fix the delivery dates and quantities that
are confirmed after an availability check.
Use
If the supplying plant cannot confirm the desired delivery date or the
desired delivery quantity in total, confirmed dates and quantities
differ from the desired dates and quantities. With this checkbox you can
control whether materials planning is based on the confirmation schedule
lines or on the desired schedule lines.
o If you select the checkbox, the goods are made available on the date
confirmed by the availability check in the supplying plant. The
system only generates confirmation schedule lines for the
requirement quantities confirmed by the ATP check.In the case of
underconfirmation, desired and confirmed quantities deviate from one
another. You cannot reschedule the corresponding purchase order
item.
o If you do not select the checkbox, materials planning is performed
according to your Customizing settings. In the Customizing activity
Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule, you can use the ATP Conf.
MRP field to indicate whether materials planning is based on desired
or confirmed schedule lines. You do this for a combination of
document type, supplying plant, and checking rules. If you select
the checkbox in Customizing, confirmation schedule lines are still
taken into account in the case of rescheduling.
Note
If you select this checkbox in a stock transport order, the system
ignores the Customizing settings described above for all schedule lines
of the purchase order item in question.
BR
Caetano
↧
Re: Can't export to Excel from MB5L?
well... for me works very well, only for verify... activating debug mode (/h) and inmediately type the command, you will be placed into the following line of code:
...and the value at gt_stack-listtype should be 'S', when the value is H (hierarchical list) this trick not Works.
And you can check also if your SAP user has the authority object S_GUI. (or inmediately after the command, check if some autorization is missing with /osu53)
And reset the defaul export format with &RESET_EXCEL command.
Regards.
↧
Re: Can't export to Excel from MB5L?
Hi Marques,
Try to convert the excel file to text tab delimited (its text format) by giving save as, it show whether ur data are properly tabbed or not and also use text file to export.
↧
Invoice Verification
Business wants a separate variance account to be assigned for services like freight. But in OBYC, we can only have one account for transaction DIF. We create purchase order with account assignment U and subsequent documents are Service sheet and Service Acceptance. When invoice verification is done using MIRO all variances go to single variance account. We only add text in PO for service material and do not use actual material.
Please advice.
↧
↧
Duplicate line item is being created while creating delivery in sto
Hi Experts,
I have come across a situation where duplicate line items are being created in Delivery. I have checked document flow and predessor tab that is same. Please do advise me to resolve the issues
↧
Re: STO PO not displayed in MD04 due to committed date
Thanks Canteno you were spot on.
I am closing the ticket
↧
Re: Change Material Origin at Purchase Order
Jeferson, o meu entendimento também foi esse mas não consigo visualizar uma relação de 1 para 1 entre o tipo de avaliação e origem de material. É como se eu tivesse que criar um tipo de avaliação para cada valor do campo de origem de material, não faz sentido. Ou para cada possibilidade de compra de um mesmo material (que pode ser importando ou não e outros), ter que ficar atualizando a origem do material na visão contabilidade 2 no mestre de materiais.
De qualquer forma abri um chamado na SAP mais cedo e estou aguardando retorno.
Obrigado pela ajuda.
Ricardo
↧