Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 9093 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Stock at Batch Level does not add up at the Plant Level

$
0
0

I actually assumed that it was caused by such direct updates, and maybe even because of incorrect customizing at the time of data load or delivery creation.

This is nothing that can be solved by strangers who cannot access your system to analyze the EXACT situation and have no knowledge about the EXACT cut-over activities, have not participated in crisis management.

Get the people together see if they can offer a solution, otherwise get help of SAP who can access your system or send a team to you, you probably have to pay for  and may charge it to your provider


Re: Invoice receipt

$
0
0

Hello ,

 

i believe , vendor will send invoice as per agreed pay terms , like 30 % in 10 days remaining post 60 days. And data entry person will enter what ever invoice is .

 

So if you control it with pay term vendor should send invoice of agreed amount and quantity only.and the user need to enter the same.


other approach will be split the Quantity in ,multiple line items in PO then do GR with the delivery note and then Park an invoice with delivery note. and let the accounting person to post it as per business requirement .



Thanks

kUnal



Re: Specific address format display following country

$
0
0

Hi Tom,

 

Go to t.code: OY01 (Country global parameters)

 

For example : If your country code (Vendor )is belongs to Germany.

 

select Country   Name

             DE        GERMANY  double click

 

if you go below in the column tab - Address Format :

 

Example: Check Address layout key : 015 Germany

 

Address routine-Use

 

001- European standard address

002- Italy

003- Netherlands

004- USA

005- Canada

006- Great Britain

007- Brazil

008- Singapore ( Postal code after city)

009- Australia

010- Postal code before city without country code

011- Switzerland

012- South Africa

013- Japan (Old)

014- Austria

015- Germany

017- South Korea

019- Denmark

113- Japan (New)

 

Hope this will help you.

 

Regards,

 

Vivek

Re: Standard BAPI to bring GRN value breakup as per condition types

$
0
0

Hi Prasoon,

 

Thanks for your suggestion I was able to meet my requirement with the above BAPI.

Sorry for the delay in response as there was some connectivity issues due to bad weather conditions.

 

Regards,

Ganesh

Re: how does sap know if a document is cancelled/reversed?

$
0
0

SELECT mseg~mblnr mseg~mjahr zeile

  smbln sjahr smblp budat usnam matnr bwart

  shkzg werks lgort menge meins

* take ERFME and ERFMG, too "n548730

  erfme erfmg "n548730

  INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE belege

  FROM mkpf INNER JOIN mseg

  ON mkpf~mandt = mseg~mandt

  AND mkpf~mblnr = mseg~mblnr

  AND mkpf~mjahr = mseg~mjahr

WHERE mseg~smbln IN mblnr
  AND mseg~smbln <> space
  AND mseg~sjahr IN mjahr.

Issue with MIRO posting for material with MAP

$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

We have issue with MIRO posting for material with price control V also Material Ledger Active

 

Situation is...

Configurable material activated with price control V. Client creates first PO for 1 EA - Net Price say 27214/ USD.

GR posted and so accounting entries and ML document...

 

Accounting entry

GR/IR Account  -27214/- USD....and local currency 65,792.02- BRL

                          +27214/- USD........

 

ML Document

Vice versa of above....

 

----

Now we do MIRO.....

Here in Tab 'PO Reference' PO added and all populated...and then hit Simulate...

KBS27214.00- USD
WRX65792.02   BRL
KDM17469.49   BRL
BSX17469.49   BRL
KDM17469.49-  BRL

 

Now in GL Account tab....

Add Provisioning for 3000 USD Credit...

 

and in Material tab

Add material, plant and 3000 USD debit....and Quantity from stock which 1 EA...

 

Now when Simulated...here's how it look like

KBS27214.00-
WRX65792.02
KDM17469.49
PRD9178.53
KBS9178.53-
BSX13324.02
PRY4589.27-
KDM8734.75-

 

Here can somebody throw some light how BSX is calcuated????????????????
Basically in debugging BSX is calculated like Sum of PRY and KDM....PRY = PRD / 2 and KDM = KDM / 2.
So BSX = ( PRD / 2 ) + ( KDM / 2 )....Now this 2 is interesting that it considers total quantity as 2 when in stock it's only 1 EA....

 

Here client expectation is BSX = PRD + KDM

Re: Issue with MIRO posting for material with MAP

$
0
0

Hi,

Share posting keys assigned to KDM transaction key in t.code:OBYC including G/L account.

 

Can you share  following screen.

1. Accounting document for Goods receipt for your PO.

2. Accounting document for Invoice receipt for your PO.

 

Regards,

Biju K

Re: Transfer Posting in MIGO asking for Vendor

$
0
0

Hi,

   Please check whether the field LIFNR is maintained as mandatory entry for the movement type in OMJJ - field selection (enjoy) or in OLMB - Settings for Enjoy Transactions - Settings for Goods Movements (MIGO) - Field Selection per Mvt Type. If so, maintain it as optional and test the scenario again.

   Let us know the message number if the system still throws the message.

 

Regards,

AKPT


reg. South africa commodity code

$
0
0

Dear All ,

 

it may be basic question to you but its important for me in roll out.

 

My client is from south Africa , I am asking him commodity code list but he is not able to understand it , providing me different certificates instead of commodity code.

 

How can I explain him to get list of commodity code.

is there any way , of in Legacy system these commodity code comes.Means I can give him that example.

 

Br,

MK

Re: Transfer Posting in MIGO asking for Vendor

$
0
0

The error Message M7018 (Enter Vendor) you're getting when you do transfer posting using the transaction MIGO is due to the field selection (enjoy) you made for the movement 309 in the transaction OMJJ as required. Try to change the field selection from required to optional else do the transfer posting using the transaction MB1B, hope you won't get the error and you can find the field selection for movements using in MB1B in the transaction OMBW.

Re: Planned Delivery Cost

$
0
0

Hi,

   As of my knowledge, there is no option in standard (ECC) to link the service contract and normal material PO freight condition type. Instead, you can create access sequence for the condition record and maintain the agreed price with validity date. But if you want to control the total price based on contract, there is no option in standard as of my knowledge.

   If you can think about Transportation Management (LE-TM), then you may create a service PO with validity period and system can always create SES against this PO from shipment cost document. The freight value can be maintained at TM condition record level (TK11) and the same can be loaded to material cost at the time of GR. It will ensure the three way match as well. But, inbound delivery is mandatory in this case. Refer the note: 427944 - Info: Shipment costs as delivery costs during goods receipt

 

Regards,

AKPT

Re: Planned Delivery Cost

$
0
0

Dear Prasoon,

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

I being a non-technical guy so unable to fully comprehend your suggestion. Shall share your reply with our Technical Personnel and get back to you once I get a response from him.

 

Thanks again.

 

Regards,

Husein N T.

Re: Planned Delivery Cost

$
0
0

Hi,

   But I dont think I suggested anything to be done by technical consultant!

 

Regards,

AKPT

Re: Planned Delivery Cost

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Technical consultant in the sense not the ABAP developer or someone of that stature. It meant someone who is aware of the configuration part in SAP (like FI or MM Consultant).

 

I am a domain guy and hence have little knowledge on what you suggested so shall share it with an SAP guy who is aware of LE-TM / TK-11 / SAP-Notes.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Husein N T.

Re: Issue with MIRO posting for material with MAP

$
0
0

Hi,

Your local Currency is BRL and your vendor Currency is USD. So exchage rate difference make the your GR ad IR postings.

 

Now check ( with business and FI/CO team) any logic behind for assigning two G/L accounts (posting key 40)406001 and ( posting key50)244802 for KDM transaction key in t.code:OBYC

 

But your GR posting date  11-09-2015 and document date 11-09-2015

&

IR posting date  11-09-2015 and document date 11-03-2015

 

Regards,

Biju K


Re: reg. South africa commodity code

$
0
0

Please check the commodity code for a Country using the following function or check the table T604 with country code ZA.

 

OLME --> Foreign trade/ Customs --> Basic data for foreign trade --> Define Commodity code / Import trade numbers by country

 

For better understanding, Please read the last section of the following link.

Foreign Trade Data in Purchasing Documents - Basic Functions (SD-FT-PRO) - SAP Library

 

You've to communicate with some screenshots in order to explain your need. For example, use the material master template where you'll assign the commodity code number. For details press F1.

 

commodity.png

Re: reg. South africa commodity code

$
0
0

If your client does not understand what a commodity code is then they use either a different word like HTS code or import/export code or HS code or statistical goods number or custom tariff code, or they had never dealt with this at all since their carrier did all the export/import and customs processing, or you just got not the right person into your team.

You could Google an official page e.g. using the search term "south africa commodity codes" you could get to Export Help - HS Classification Codes - the HS in South Africa

 

Showing this to your client may enable him to remember.

And if not, then maybe you have to understand that their company does not need this for their business. You could ask them how import / export is done currently with their legacy system.

Re: Goods Delivery and Goods-Receipt Based Invoice Verification In PO

$
0
0

Hi,

   Seems to be strange. As of my knowledge, there is no settings required to copy the GR / service based IV from vendor master to PO. I would recommend to check whether any own development is altering the standard behavior. If its not due to own development, revert back with SAP release with EHP.

 

Regards,

AKPT

Re: Goods Delivery and Goods-Receipt Based Invoice Verification In PO

$
0
0

Maybe there are data retained at vendor subrange level (table LFM2) which have precedence.

Re: Goods Delivery and Goods-Receipt Based Invoice Verification In PO

$
0
0

True...But I think in that case, it should not reflect when the PO is created manually, without reference too. Please correct me if I am wrong...

Viewing all 9093 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>