Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 9093 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: MIGO In Stock Transfer and Inter Company

January 22, 2015, 2:24 pm
$
0
0

a STO process is within 2 parties in your own system

if pant A ships 100 and plant B receives 50, then still 50 are in-transit.

You can't just leave it there. A delivery complete indicator cannot clear in-transit stock.

 

with external vendors, you do not have any in-transit stock. if you receive less than ordered then the delivery complete indicator closes the order virtually, hence you get no item proposal in MIGO. However this message is not really an error, you can still do a receipt, you only need to set the flag for propose all items in the settings in MIGO transaction.

↧
Search

Issue in KONV-KWERT value

January 22, 2015, 2:57 pm
$
0
0

Hi

 

I have created a PO and the condition tab in the header shows the below values

 

PBXXGross Price100
Net value incl. disc100
ZHCPHandling Charges %10
ZHCVHandling Chrgs (Val)10
Actual price120

 

 

whereas the KONV-KWERT field shows the below values

 

PBXX1,000.00
ZHCP100
ZHCV100

 

 

Why the system stores each condition type values multiplied by "10"  in KONV_KWERT ?

 

 

Regards

Harshini

↧
↧

Re: Issue in KONV-KWERT value

January 22, 2015, 3:26 pm
$
0
0

what is the currency and how much decimals are set for this currency?

technically is KWERT a currency field with 2 decimals

if a currency is define with 3 decimals then SAP has to get this to this field with a trick, it just moves the digits into that field and keeps the comma as is, which means a value with 3 decimals is 10 times bigger in the table view as you expect. In the dynpro it is dsplayed according to the currency settings.

↧

Different Plant in Purchase Order vs intended Goods Receive

January 22, 2015, 7:36 pm
$
0
0

Good Day Gurus,

 

I'm currently in this kind of scenario wherein a Purchase Order was created,released, with subsequent invoice under plant "X"

which was delivered and and must be GR by plant "Y".

 

What is/are the best solution to aid this concern?

 

below coming up with this question, below are some of the possible solutions i already gathered

 

1. GR the Purchase Order in plant "X" then do Transfer Post to plant "Y"

2. Reverse all the Invoices made to specific line item in Purchase Order, delete the line item, copy the line item and changed the plant. But with this case, all the invoices applied before to the original line item must be performed again to the new line item.

 

 

Is there any other possible solution to this?

 

Thank you and Regards,

Harvey

↧

will goods movement transaction update serial and equipment master automatically

January 22, 2015, 7:29 pm
$
0
0

Hi

 

I am wondering if the following functionality is possible in SAP serial number.

 

IF I set my serial number as external number range and maintain a serial profile and serial level as “1” in the material master.

 

Next, I performed a goods receipt with MIGO 101, and during which a pop-up box appears and since I order 20 pc, I entered the 20 serial number (which are found on the GR shipment from vendor) and save the MIGO.

 

Question:
May I know if the SAP will populate all the business fields (See below) into the Serial Master (i.e. IQ03) and Equipment Master (IE03) automatically in the background?

If it not possible, how to make it possible in the system configuration? Reason I am asking this.. it is quite inefficient to pre-create the serial and equipment master data manually.

Q1.jpg

 

Q2.jpg

 

 

Regards

Tuff

↧
↧

Re: Different Plant in Purchase Order vs intended Goods Receive

January 22, 2015, 8:41 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

   As you already mentioned, receiving the material in plant X and then transfer posting with 301 movement to plant Y will be the best option if you can not change the plant in PO due to subsequent docs.

 

Regards,

AKPT

↧

Re: Restrict user to a particular plant

January 22, 2015, 8:55 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

you can use implicit enhancement point in FORM pf-titel_setzen for example and filter out table  tab_pohdr there using any appropriate authorization object you like.

 

Like this:

LOOP at tab_pohdr.

  AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'put_your_auth_object_here' ID 'WERKS' FIELD tab_pohdr-werks.

  if sy-subrc <> 0.

    delete tab_pohdr.

  endif.

ENDLOOP.


↧

Re: Different Plant in Purchase Order vs intended Goods Receive

January 22, 2015, 9:09 pm
$
0
0

Thank you PRASOON,

 

I'm still looking for any other option aside from this (if still has)

but i do firmly believe that this is not possible anymore and those mentioned options are the only way to aid the concern.

 

This is a recurring situation in our company,specifically for our Imported Purchase Order.

↧
Search

Re: Different Plant in Purchase Order vs intended Goods Receive

January 22, 2015, 9:46 pm
$
0
0

The plants in the order and in the receipt have to match.

Don't you know your plant when you order?

↧
↧

Re: Tax Code I1 ditribute to MIRO line

January 23, 2015, 10:19 pm
$
0
0

Hi Majid,

 

At the time of MIRO posting, you change the tax code. So change it as per your vendor invoice. But this will impact on your stock values, if the tax is non deductible. If it is deductible, then there is no issue for change it in MIRO.

 

Regards,

Mukthar

↧

Re: Post inventory differences

January 23, 2015, 10:21 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

You can use special periods only in FI. You cannot use in MM postings. So you have to provide period 12 instead of 13.

 

Regards,

Mukthar

↧

Re: Amend the scheduling aggrement

January 23, 2015, 10:58 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

   Hope its external email where you maintain the email text in the output type / condition record.

   You can go for two output types - once for creation (say NEU) and a new output type (say ZNEU) for amendment . Create a new output type and assign to the output procedure. Maintain the condition record for both the condition types and maintain the required header texts for the condition record / output type.

   Now, go to the path: OLME - Messages - Output Control - Message Types - Define Message Types for Outline Agreement - Fine-Tuned Control: Outline Purchase Agreement. Here, for the first output type /(say NEU for SA creation), maintain the operation as 1 and for the other output type (say ZNEU for SA amendment), maintain the operation as 2 as shown below:

11.png

 

    Test the scenario again with a new SA. While creating, NEU output will be triggered. Once its outputted and you make any print relevant change in the SA, new output type (ZNEU) will be triggered, for which you  have maintained a different header text in the output type. Test the scenario again.

 

Regards,

AKPT

↧

DESADV01 vs DELVRY07

January 23, 2015, 11:02 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Currently we are using IDOC basic type "DESADV01" for ASN inbound IDOC's. we got a new requirement to update handling units and serial numbers. when I was checking the latest version "DELVRY07", i could see it has got many relevant segments/fields for handling units, whereas in "DESADV01", we don't have those segments/fields, I know "DESDAV01" is outdated version.

 

Is it easy to upgrade to latest version or we can extend "DESADV01" to meet the business requirement.. which approach would be better and cost effective? I don't have much idea on this, can you please provide your inputs.. Thanks in advance..

 

Regards,

Prabu

↧
↧

cost used by MI10 for previous period posting date

January 23, 2015, 11:25 pm
$
0
0

Hi all

If I run MI10 in January with posting date 31/12 (since that the physical count has been done in 31/12), the difference quantity will be calculated between the stock counted entered in MI10 and the final stock at 31/12 and the cost used for evaluate this difference quantity will be the cost saved in the material master for the previous period, not the current cost at the entering date in the system, is it correct?

While if I use MI10 during the current period, in this example in January, the difference quantity will be calculated between the stock counted entered in MI10 and the stock as at the entering date and the cost used for evaluate this difference quantity will be the current cost at the entering date in the system, is it true?

Thanks.

Sally

↧

Re: cost used by MI10 for previous period posting date

January 24, 2015, 12:42 am
↧
Search

Re: Amend the scheduling aggrement

January 24, 2015, 1:14 am
$
0
0

Hi Prasoon,

 

1. can I use NEU for operation 1 & 2, because our company used like that.

 

2.from my test when i used ZNEU its not update the change message flag in message but the changes are display in print preview

and header text not changed.

↧

Re: Amend the scheduling aggrement

January 24, 2015, 2:45 am
$
0
0

Hi,

   Please let me know where you maintained the text. My previous reply was assuming "Hope its external email where you maintain the email text in the output type / condition record.". This text will be displayed as the subject for the PO email.

   If you are expecting the text to be updated in the print preview, you need to make the required changes in the output smart form itself. Create a copy of the smartform and make the changes to show as amendment SA and assign to ZNEU output type.

 

Regards,

AKPT

↧
↧

PR Release

January 24, 2015, 2:51 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

 

Is it possible to check company / plant level stock of particular material while releasing Purchase requisition on same screen (ME54N / ME55)

 

Material MRP type is - Non planning

↧

Re: PR Release

January 24, 2015, 3:57 am
$
0
0

Hi,

   In ME54N, select the item and go to Menu - Environment - Material Stock as shown below:

23.png

 

Regards,

AKPT

↧

Re: Account determination for Non-Valuated material

January 27, 2015, 8:55 am
$
0
0

Hi Rafael

 

Thanks a lot for your valuable inputs.

 

I have tested with GR non-valuated PO. As I mention above, there is no issue till Goods Receipt, but when we do the invoice verification then the system is asking to maintain the WRX account. I just maintained the WRX account in OBYC. When I simulate in MIRO the below entries are shown

 

Consumption acc    Debit

Vendor Acc            Credit.

 

there is no entry of GR/IR acc. So hope the system is working fine as expected.

 

Could you please advice me whether it is good approach to activate the "Accounting view" for the Non-valuated materials since it is not suggested by SAP. Will be there any other impacts when we do the goods issue against Cost center / Order.

 

 

Regards

Harshini

↧
Viewing all 9093 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>