This field selection is hard coded by SAP. If you look into the blog post, you can see the explanation about these all field selection keys.
↧
Re: Purchasing group field disappear from purchase order header
↧
Where to enter supplying plant during auto PO in migo
hello,
I am creating automatic PO in migo with mvmt type 101. Auto PO indicator had been checked in MMR, VMR, PIR.
In migo with reference to PO, for non ordered items, i want to create auto PO.
But during final check, system is asking to enter ' supplying plant ' .
Can anybody tell where to enter Supplying plant. I am not using any STO.
Regards,
Diptanshu Gupta
↧
↧
Re: ME21N showing contracts blocked in source list
Hi Limor,
Did you check the validity period for blocked source in Source List.
A blocked source is not supposed to be used in PR / PO by standard SAP functionality.
Regards,
Anindita
↧
Re: Where to enter supplying plant during auto PO in migo
Hi Diptanshu,
Apart from checking Auto PO indicator in Material Master, Vendor Master and Info \Record, you need to do the following :
Assign your plant to a standard Pur Org using OMKI transaction (this is must)
Activate Auto PO for your requireed movement type using transaction code OBJJ (in this case, 101)
Maintain Source List, Inforecord and Inforecord condition records for the material
During MIGO, you need to put vendor code This would create the PO in background.
After completion of the process, the PO number would be displayed .
Regards,
Anindita
↧
Re: Where to enter supplying plant during auto PO in migo
hello,
the above mentioned settings had already been defined.
- assign std purch org to plant.
- Auto PO for movement type.
- maitain source list , info records.
But no where we have to mention supplying plant. But during final check in MIGO, system giving error - ENTER THE SUPPLYING PLANT.
Regards
↧
↧
Re: Where to enter supplying plant during auto PO in migo
I am trying in MB01 also. Same error showing.
↧
Re: Automatically update exchange rate field in MIR7 (INVFO-KURSF)
Hi Pablo,
With my above explanation, do you understand the requirement? Do you still consider there is no other way but to use the standard exchange rate?
Thank you.
BR,
Anthony
↧
Re: ME21N showing contracts blocked in source list
Thanks Anindita.
The validty end date of all contracts is 31.12.9999.
Is the behavior of your system as you described? Because ours shows all of the blocked contracts in the list of ME21N.
↧
Re: ME21N showing contracts blocked in source list
You cannot include source list information into the document overview. You might need to maintain this block in the contract itself (ME32K > Edit > block), so that you can include this info into the selection.
Or you switch to the usual way of source assignment: ME57.
ME21N is named "create purchase order vendor known", which actually excludes a source determination.
↧
↧
Re: Output Type for Purchase Order
As you asking about the procedure, I would suggest you to search in SCN for the step by step procedure. I am sure that you will get the procedure as because there are lots of discussion is there.
if you are facing a particular error or problem, then please share the problem or error message.
As per your initial discussion, if you requirement is to trigger the message determination as per plant, means if you want to create the condition record with regards to plant combination, then it will not work as per this OSS note 457497 - FAQ: Message processing in purchasing, answer no 22.
↧
Missing part Functionality: output
Hi ,
I have a request from client : For missing part functionality , an Adobe form needs to be developed and apart from the standard functionality to send an email, they also want to take physical print of this output.
What we have now is a mail being generated to MRP controller of the Products being received at time of Goods receipt , for missing part.
I have tried to search through google and SCN threads regarding this, but could' nt find any thing.
Wanted to know if some one else has done this requirement as well?
Regards
Rahul
↧
Re: Keep equipment number and serial number synchronous
Hi Mohan,
have you solved your problem? I'm facing the same one!
thank you very much.
Maria Grazia
↧
Re: Missing part Functionality: output
Hi
Go to SPRO >> Materials Management >> Inventory management >> Output Determination > Define Output types
Here check Message type 'MLFH' (Mail Message for missing Parts)
This message type is used to send the mail automatically to the MRP Controller USer ID. You dont required do any changes. BUt check whether this message type is assigned your message schema, in output determination this schema was assigned and check whethere a condition record exists for this message type.
Check sap Note 426648 - Missing part mail checklist for goods movements which is Relevant to this settings if you struck any where.
Thanks
Mahesh
↧
↧
Re: Keep equipment number and serial number synchronous
Hi Maria Grazia,
Please can you show us the error message have you when you want to maintain the Serial number sync in the material master.
Regards,
Xavier
↧
Re: Using BADI: MD_PURREQ_CHANGE
Hi, thank you for your reply.
I sow your comments, thank you for the explanation.
A breakpointfor testing andthe transactionSE19it was implementedrequestingand activatingBadishows the status"Implementation will notbecalled"
And in aMD04of thetest rundid not calltheBADI.
And I sow the note 1783556 - BAdI MD_EXT_SUP is not called by MRP
and the storage location for stock transfer requisitions between storage locations on the following customizing is active.
Do you have any sugestion?
↧
Re: Using BADI: MD_PURREQ_CHANGE
Hi Josiane
I suppose that you forgot to activate your BAdI implementation.
Try the following steps:
1 - Open BAdI MD_EXT_SUP on transaction SE18.
2 - Go to menu "Implementation", "Overwiew".
3 - Select your BAdI implementation on the popup and choose "edit".
4 - Press CTRL + F3.
Your BAdI should be now active and the runtime behavior should have been changed to "Implementation is called".
Regards
Caetano
↧
Re: Using BADI: MD_PURREQ_CHANGE
Hi,
Thank you very much again for your reply, Caetano.
But my ABAP see, and it is the same thing as access by SE19 implementation of badi and results of the same result, it activates, but the status is like will not be called.
But I realized that this BADI also does not bring the store location of needed of the production order, for example, and so evaluate this BADI brings the same information as the BADI MD_PURREQ_CHANGE.
We need some routine for bring to the purchase requisition generated by MRP the store location of the source needed and no the store location which comes from the MM03 stuff - MRP2 view.
Regards,
Josiane
↧
↧
Re: Using BADI: MD_PURREQ_CHANGE
Hi Josiane
I suggest you to go through the WIKI already refered here.
The wiki explains that an active implementation /ISDFPS/MD_EXT_SUP was delivered as active by mistake. If you want to create your own implementation of this BAdI, you must follow the steps described on note 961535 to deactivate it.
Regards
Caetano
↧
Challenging Task in STO SLoc to SLoc
Dear MM Gurus,
I have configured STO SLoc to SLoc for 129 plants and 987 SLocs.
Now I have to do testing of all 987 SLocs but problem is that it is taking hell lot of time for Testing STO.
My requirement is whether is it possible to enable those values only in issuing SLoc field in STO for which i did configuration?
For example Following SLocs have been assigned to Plant 2000
0001
0002
0003
1000
1001
4000
6000
6008
6999
8888
9999
Now I did STO configuration for following SLoc's only: Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule According to Storage Location & Define Shipping Data for Stock Transfers Between Storage Locations
0001
0002
0003
1000
9999
So is it possible to popoulate the above fields only(when pressed F4) while creating STO in issuing SLoc field currently it displys all SLocs which are maintained for Plant 2000.
Kindly help.Helpful answers will definitely rewarded with points.
Regards,
AJ
↧
MIGO In Stock Transfer and Inter Company
I like to clarify one thing.I have a stock transport order with 100 qty..I did delivery for 50 and PGI for 50 and then MIGO. After that delivery complete and final delivery indicator is checked in PO. When I try to do MIGO for rest of the item I get following message
Document 4500001842 does not contain any selectable items
Now I did the same thing for inter-company order ...Delivery,PGI and MIGO .First MIGO I did for 50 .After that delivery complete and final delivery box was checked.Now I tried to do MIGO again and it allowed me to MIGO for rest of QTY.This time I didn't get above message.
Any reason behind that ?
↧