Sridhar,
the previous Reservation (t-code MB21) has obviously a cost centre and a G/L account, so the MIGO with reservation catches the same data..
↧
Re: Account determination for entry ... EIN 1111 not possible - info record related?
↧
Re: Creation of PR through MRP run for STO
See the following link from the on-line help with more details:
↧
↧
Account determination for entry ... EIN 1111 not possible - info record related?
A goods issue from consignment stock will certainly look for a price in the info record.
and the system works as described in OSS Note 301418 - Price from info record with deletion flag determined
you can try to change the condition validity, if that does not help you may have to archive the info record
↧
Re: Creation of PR through MRP run for STO
Hi,
You can do MRP related setting for your material master with maintaining MRP group in your material master in the MRP 1 view.
Use the transaction code OMDT and assign your Plant,MRP group and STO PR document type to have as default order type in PR creation.
Now run MRP your material master and find how system picks the default STO PR document type.
Regards,
Biju K
↧
Re: Auto PR creation on ROH material type
Hi, Ram
do not forget put Create Purchase Req. = 1 or 2 in MRP control parameters setting i.e in MD02
if it is 3 , always planned order created but not PR.
Regards
Jason
↧
↧
Invoice Prepayment with MM
Hi Experts,
I have a requirement from client. They need to enter invoices for prepayments. I see this could be done through Materials Management- Logistics Invoice Verification - Incoming Invoice - Prepayment. I need some help on how to configure this. For client registering prepayments through FI as vendor sends an invoice.
Thank you,
Moderator message: Basic frequently asked question - Please search forum for answers and read the docu in help.sap.com
See as well our rules of engagement: http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-19331
A good way to search the forum is with google. See this blog with details for a good search
This blog describes how to use the SCN search: http://scn.sap.com/community/about/blog/2012/12/04/how-to-use-scn-search
Thread locked
Message was edited by: Jürgen L
↧
Purchase Order without Pricing conditions in Item level
We have a PO which doesn't have Pricing Conditions in Item level. There's no conditions tab on item level at all.
How did this happen and how can I add Pricing Conditions on item level?
Thank you!!!
↧
Quantity field elements in the RESB table
Hello!
Can you please let me know how the field, NOMNG (Required Quantity), differes from the following quantity fields in the RESB table and how the NOMNG field is used and from where it is populated? I'm looking at component requirements for subcontract purchase orders. I am using ECC 6.0, EhP4.
- BDMNG - Requirement Quantity - I understand this is the required quantity in the base unit of measure.
- ERFMG - Quantity in Unit of Entry - I understand this is the quantity in the Unit of Entry UOM that comes from the BOM. We have a few BOMs where the quantity is in a UOM that is different than the base unit of measure.
NOMNG - Required Quantity - Not sure what the purpose of this field is.
Thanks very much in advance for any guidance.
Chris
↧
Re: Purchase Order without Pricing conditions in Item level
Hi,
First of all, check the vendor master purchasing view, whether any schema group is given. Now note down your purchase organization given in the PO.
Now check the schema groups for your purchase organization and vendor in the path SPRO-MM-Purchasing-COnditions-Define Price Determiantion Process-Define Schema Determination-Define Schema Group.
Check your price determination process in the path SPRO-MM-Purchasing-COnditions-Define Price Determiantion Process-Define Schema Determination-Determine Calculation Schema for standard purchase orders.
Check whether any pricing procedure has been assigned to your purchase organization and vendor schema group.
This will solve your issue.
Additionally, you may check the authorization also in SU53 from PO screen, if its a new user id, since missing authorization objects may hide the condition tab.
Hope its helpful.
Regards
AKPT
↧
↧
Purchase Order without Pricing conditions in Item level
Hello,
First of all , make pricing procedure with condition type and access sequence.
After that make schema group and assign that with pricing procedure.
Now schema group assign in the vendor master.Using that vendor in purchase order, it will call automatically. Please check and update.
Regards,
Bhaumik
↧
Re: Purchase Order without Pricing conditions in Item level
Hi,
Cross check and discuss with Basis Consultant for having authorization ( for your user ID) to view “Condition” TAB in your Purchase Order Number and Purchase Order Document Type
Regards,
Biju K
↧
Re: MMPV - Check and Close Period - Very Slow
Tks for you reply AKPT but I forgot to mention that we use ECC 6.0...
This note can't be implemented in our version unfortunately.
↧
Transfer Posting 303/305 in transit with dates t-code
Hi,
There is not any standard report. You have to do manually tracking else do some enhancement in delivery note.
Regards,
Bhaumik
↧
↧
Re: Cycle counting Report
Hi Sukrati,
I don't know of a standard report to dump this data.
We have build a quick query for this it's a pretty easy query on the MARC table.
Regards,
↧
Inventory Reconciliation
Hello All,
My client is seeking direction on how to reconcile inventory to make auditors happy. I have not done an inventory recon myself and did a little homework. I would like to get your opinion. From what I have gathered, I can use MB5L to get the inventory value from a G/L perspective, then compare that number against current inventory value from MC.9. Is this correct? Are there better ways to reconcile inventory?
Kind Regards!
↧
Re: Inventory Reconciliation
not sure what exactly you want do with MC.9. MC.9 is a statistic transaction. I personally do not really trust it, if you search SCN with MC.9 then you know the reason.
MB5L already compares the balance of FI stock accounts with the summary of stock values from the MM valuation tables like MBEW.
When I load inventory for a Go-Live, then MB5L is the main report for reconciliation between MM and FI.
in addition we execute MB52 to reconcile with legacy stock at inventoy management level, and LX02 to compare WM stocks
↧
Unlimited indicator has not flown from contract to PO
Had you eventually changed the price too?
Because I found OSS Note 1644491 - unlimited overdelivery flag is cleared with price change
↧
↧
Inventory Reconciliation
This client has been up and running since Oct of 2013. They would like to do monthly inventory reconcilliation as their inventory controls right now are not very good. So are you saying that the best way to know if inventory is balanced is basically run MB5L. If the variance is 0.00, then G/L and inventory on hand is equal? If there is a variance, what are the best ways to research. BTW, the client also uses WM, if that matters.
↧
Error 06 313 "Material differs from material & from the info record"
I create a purchase order with a material without inforecord and we assigned to purchase order another material's inforecord . I could save the purchase order, but this is wrong. I expected get the message error 06313, but this doesn't appears.
Can you help, I need to get this message when I am creating the purchase order with this wrong data.
Thank you in advance.
↧
Inventory Reconciliation
yes if the variance is 0, then G/L and inventory is equal.
If you have a variance, then check OSS Note 968812 - MM/FI Difference for material stocks
it list a few reasons that can cause such variances.
And knowledgebase article 1846376 - MM/FI difference occurs in transaction MB5L and report RM07MMFI for current year has additional info for investigation
↧