Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 9093 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Reconciliation of MM and FI by material

October 25, 2014, 2:18 am
$
0
0

Hi I have an issue that I haven't found the answer yet. This is what I have:

 

On a Raw materials stock account I have the total reconciliation Ok but not for each material. I compare between FI and MM the two periods that the MB5L (I think this is the TA) allowed me by material between October and September and they were OK.

 

In Fi there are Materials (some in negative, so not correct) which are not active (range outside 4 and 7) and values without materials. The period taken is all the acumulative for this account.

 

In MM I have a list of materials all actives and positive (it seems that this is correct). Remember the total of each modul is equal.

 

Then I compared the materials and the values from MM with FI. I found that some of them are in FI with the same value, other are in FI too but with diferrences between MM.

 

The differences between of FI are distributed as follows: some in MM (active) materials, some in other materials not active anymore, and others without materials.

 

I tried to analyse the movements in MM and Fi. I found that a lot of materials with the same value in MM and FI haven't inicial stock, so I was almost certain that this issue was because of the transition from old numbers materials (in FI) to the new number materials (all in MM). But then I find some materials with differences without initial stock either....so maybe there are two casuistries..:

 

- Maybe with the materials with differences without initial stock the problem is the materials movements that weren't done with the correct material movement code....And the other differences were due to the wrong number transition with the initial sotck....

 

This is what I have in mind but I would thank to anybody that could give me a lead or the possible answer to this issue.

↧
Search

Re: Material Posting

October 25, 2014, 2:59 am
$
0
0

Hi, There is no provision for the Draft status as per my under standing.

Please check the transaction codes - MM11, MM12, MM13. You can create the material with a scheduled date and You can activate the same as per the required date. You can explore this facility. It may be useful against your requirement.

 

Ram S

↧
↧

Re: Goods issue quantities exceeds reservation - MIGO_GI

October 25, 2014, 5:11 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Please check the Reservation as the User may be reduced the quantity of reservation after posting the Goods issue. For Ex: Reservation Created for 2 No's and Goods issue done. After goods issue, the reservation qty may be changed to 1 No.

 

Ram S

↧

How to add second catlog in mc18 to existed one

October 25, 2014, 5:21 am
$
0
0

Dear MM Experts

i am sd consultant ..First time i am doing configuration Product Allocation Configuration

i have searched in Google and in scn also but i have not got any link to add ..

 

 

 

 

I have created in MC18 With the name ZARA

And with Character catalog Option

 

Now i have saved this data and i want to go to 2 nd option Key Figure catalog...

 

i have checked That second option but system is showing all ready existed

because all ready i have created the data with First Option ..

 

 

 

 

So please could you guide me how to skip this issue

i have tried to find in Google but not the case ..so i have requested in this Forum ..

↧

Re: Reconciliation of MM and FI by material

October 25, 2014, 6:48 am
$
0
0

A want to clearify one thing that is very plausible, I haven't the data right now, but I think to remember that the negative stocks in FI were only on those materials also in MM, but with different ammount in FI (less). These could lead me to the point that for those materials the related initial stock were in archived materials in FI, so this could create those negate balances in FI.

 

For the other differences, on MM materials also in FI, but with no initial stock the reason could be another one, maybe those differences are in the "no materials" values in FI. But I am conjecturing, Im not an expert in MM.

 

Please if somebody knows which can be the reason of this issue, and help me to focus my work.

↧
↧

ATP for subcontracting orders

October 25, 2014, 7:49 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

    I am trying to run ATP for a subcontracting PO but when I select the component in the BOM explosion screen, and do it manually I get the error message "

No control data maintained for checking group 02 and checking rule

Message no. AG021

"

  • Where do I make this setting for a subcontracting PO type ? I know I can make it for a production order type and OPJJ tcode.

 

  • Also is there no way to do an auto ATP check for a subcon PO ? I have seen some OSS notes which say its has to be done manually. That seems to be an aweful lot of work.

 

  • My scope of check for prd orders does not have the W/O subcon requirements selected. So that means it should take the SubReq dependant demand into account.

 

  • Its not taking it into account because of the 1st issue I guess. Am I right ? So if I get it to work, then it will take it into account ?

 

Thanks

↧

How to carry out mass Change in PO when version management is active?

October 25, 2014, 8:15 am
$
0
0

Hi,

I need to close old purchase orders, I used MEMASSPO to update the ELIKZ –Delivery complete Indicator,

Since the version management is active, system is not allowing me to update the changes getting the following errors to enter the details-

 

45000xxxxx : Enter reason for change for version

MEDCM003

45000xxxxx : Enter requester for version

MEDCM005

45000xxxxx : Version management of purchase order still faulty

MEPO813

45000xxxxx : Instance 45000xxxxx of object type PurchaseOrder could not be changed

BAPI003


I checked the following fields which were from EREV and not from EKKO, then how to complete the version and update activity,

REVOK- version

RSCOD-Reason

CRNAM- Requested by

 

I searched the forum and tried with ME22 LSMW recording, but the above fields were not recorded, I never used BAPI, so dont know how proceed,

 

Please help me in this regard, Is there any standard method to update old PO when version management activated?

 

Thanks

↧

MIGO problem

October 29, 2014, 10:41 pm
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

We are facing a unique problem, user created 2 PO's say A and B, PO A was created in July and  PO B was created in August. Material in Purchase Order A has a serial number and material in Purchase Order B also has a serial number, both the purchase orders have open quantities. Now the problem arises when the user performed MIGO. I would elaborate the scenario, while performing MIGO for the purchase order A the user by mistake entered the purchase order B  and entered the serial number of the material in purchase order A. The system generated a Material document number and the serial number got copied into the equipment master IE03 against the material document. The user realises the mistake and cancels the GR. Now while performing GR for purchase order A with the actual serial number the system generates an error message stating the equipment master already holds the serial number and system is not allowing to perform MIGO for purchase order A.

Perror.JPG

 

Can anybody help?

 

Regards,

 

Sagnik

↧
Search

Re: ME59N Auto PO errors,Not possible to covert it to PO.

October 29, 2014, 10:42 pm
$
0
0


Hello,

 

Below are the settings I have it and still I am getting error thats' what I wanted to Say..

 

 

- In material master Automatic PO check box already done i checked.


- In vendor Master under purchasing view checked the box Automatic Purchase order


- Maintained the list of sources available for the given material with plant combination


-Maintained the Purchase Info record for all the vendors which are maintained in the above Source list with the material combination.


-While creating the PR under source of supply tab clicked on Assign source to fetch the details.


-Executed the transaction ME59N and provided the source (vendor number) and plant . Then System giving errors not creating POs automatically.

 

These are the things I read as well made the same changes in SAP system.

 

 

Thanks,

 

Suru

 

↧
↧

Re: PO Print Preview error " Tax code in procedure && is invalid"

October 29, 2014, 10:48 pm
↧

Re: PO Print Preview error " Tax code in procedure && is invalid"

October 29, 2014, 11:04 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

1st check which tax condition type used to maintain tax rate with  your tax code  and then check( in t.code:OBYZ) -did that tax condition type available in your Tax Procedure ZXINN.

 

2nd-Now also check in t.code:FV13 and find validity your tax code for that tax condition type.

 

Regards,

Biju K

↧

Re: financial document currency refer to reservation(mvt 261) created from W/Order

October 29, 2014, 11:05 pm
$
0
0

Dear Dibyendu Patra ,


thank you for your help.


GR.jpg

above is for GR and below is for GI.


GI.jpg


quantity is zero, but i think there are still open local inventory amount remains.


please guide me.


Best Regards,




↧

Re: financial document currency refer to reservation(mvt 261) created from W/Order

October 29, 2014, 11:23 pm
$
0
0

I hope your material has the price control V.

You need to check all movements for this material along with total stock and total value in material master record.

I am giving an example how it can be differ.

Suppose you have total stock as 10 and total value as 25 and MAP = 2.5 in your material master - Accounting 1 view.

Then you have done a GR with 5 qty and with PO price as 3.

After GR posted with GR value 15, your material master will update like below:

Total Stock = 15

Total Value = 40

MAP = 2.66.

 

Now if you will post a goods issue with 5 quantity, then system will post the amount as 5 X 2.66 = 13.3.

So here you can find the difference as GR is posted with value 15, GI is posted with value 13.3.

 

Hope the logic is clear to you.

↧
↧

Re: Open purchase requisitions at a point in time?

October 29, 2014, 10:47 pm
$
0
0

Scott,

 

  GoTO ME5A,

 

     dynamic selection under the purchase reqi

 

 

dispaly1.png

 

dispaly2.png

 

  this screen you got PR Quantity & PO Quantity .

 

  

 

hope its helpfull for you

↧

Re: ME59N Auto PO errors,Not possible to covert it to PO.

October 29, 2014, 11:33 pm
$
0
0

An automatic PO is like the word says automatic without manual entries.

This requires beside of source list and the auto PO indicators in vendor and material master very good mater data in general to make it happen.

 

The easiest way to test if a auto PO can work is to start with a requisition in ME57,

a source assignment must work just by clicking the button for source assignment, no manual slection. Then continue direct into processing which takes you to ME21N. After drag and drop of PR into the shopping cart you just click save and the PO must save. If that does not happen, then you are not ready for auto PO.

 

Your reply had nothing to do with the errors that you got. You need to focus on the errors.

↧
Search

Re: PR could not found

October 29, 2014, 11:59 pm
$
0
0

That is most useless KBA I ever saw. A PR that has history, is used in a PO, must not be deleted by a MRP run, this is bug and not a kind of design.

And PR that existed cannot have anything to do with number gaps from buffering, which are there because the number was not taken.

↧

Re: ME59N Auto PO errors,Not possible to covert it to PO.

October 30, 2014, 12:24 am
$
0
0

Hi ,

 

When I tried with ME57 then in ME21N step,I am Getting error Enter ConfirmationControl.After entering this option and saved the PO but that PO not available in the system and going back to ME57 screen when I am Clicking on save button system saying requistion already processed by another user.

 

Need help on this please.

 

Thanks,

suru

↧
↧

Re: Initial status of a new batch

October 30, 2014, 11:47 pm
$
0
0


Jurgen,

Batch Level and Batch Level -> Coversion both greyed off.

How do i proceed from here..

↧

Re: Initial status of a new batch

October 30, 2014, 11:52 pm
$
0
0


Yup Button for Conversion is Active as in the above screen.

↧

Re: Add new textkind to material master

October 31, 2014, 12:11 am
$
0
0

Hi Patra,

 

if we define her a new Distribution channel, i think we can define for this channel then a alternate salestext for the material.mm02.jpg

 

We have a sales division inhouse and they have very long an detailed textes in the material master. The other sales division is external, who works first with the customer, want to use only a part of the text and not the complete detailed text..

 

I think i must discuss in the IT Division wich is teh better of the two mentioned Solutions either using other text like Basic text or the other way to define a complete new text type as Gina Costa mentioned.

 

Karl

↧
Viewing all 9093 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>