Can you tell with which movement you get this error, I think you will only get it when you try to do another goods issue, with creating stock using 202 movement I do not expect this error.
↧
Re: stock inconsistency in consignment process
↧
Re: stock inconsistency in consignment process
Hi Jorge Garcia,
You can benefit from BIG PROBLEM / Negative stock altough not allowed in customizing , also you have to contact with sap.
Check OSS note : “935755 - Negative stock even though it is not allowed in Customizing” .
Is there a bapi method to post documents ?
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal
↧
↧
Re: Forecasting: Different customer forecasts under one material
↧
PR Release strategy
Hi,
My client has a business requirement to have release strategy for assets, consumables and external services at the PR level.
We are doing item level release strategy and I have maintained all the configuration and assignment required for release strategy.
I am using the following characteristics:
Plant (CEBAN-WERKS)
Account Assignment (CEBAN-KNTTP)
Item Category (CEBAN-PSTYP)
Cost center (CEBAN-KOSTL)
Item value (CEBAN-GSWRT)
I also have maintained the assignment (CL20N, CL24N). I also tested in CL30 and simulate it and found the correct release strategy, however when I create PR (using ME51N), system doesn't pick up any release strategy.
Did I miss anything?
Please advise
Thank you
Irawan
↧
Re: PR Release strategy
Did you assigned table name: CEBAN and field Name:BANFN in CT04 characteristic-additional data.
Kindy check it.
Regards
Sanjeet Kumar
↧
↧
Re: PR Release strategy
Hi
Check the characteristic of release strategy,click on additional data tab make sure not ready for input check box must be unchecked.
Regards
Rahul
↧
Re: PR Release strategy
Hi Sanjeet,
Thank you for your reply. I didn't see field name BANFN in table CEBAN.
BANFN is the PR no, how do we use PR no as one of the characteristics for release strategy? PR no is a dynamic value that keep increase everytime we create PR.
Rgds,
Irawan
↧
Re: PR Release strategy
Hi Rahul,
I have unchecked the "not ready for input" indicator in all the characteristics that I used.
I even use CL30N, input the values and system founds the correct release strategy. It just not appear in the PR itself.
Rgds,
Irawan
↧
Re: stock inconsistency in consignment process
Do the setting as it was before and check negative tick allowed in both movement type and do the zero difference. Correct setting against negative stock of goods issue & received then do the new posting.
Regards
Sanjeet
↧
↧
Re: Determination of CFOP Code for Valuation Type of Material Master
Hi,
If it subject to Brazil, Please check the document how CFOP affects the process:
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print46c/en/data/pdf/CAINTBR/CAINTBR.pdf
Regards
Rahul
↧
Header freight apportionment in a PO
Hi All,
I have another question, rather would like to understand if this is the standard behaviour of SAP.. as I know we have heaps of enhancements in PO.
So, wanted to know if the behaviour I explain below is standard or not:
1. FRA1/FRB1/FRC1 maintained as Item level condition only.
2. FRA2/FRB2/FRC2 maintained as header level and also group condition checked.
3. While creating info records, only FRA1/FRB1/FRC1 should be available as an option under "Conditions'.
{For this, I made a change to remove FRA2/FRB2/FRC2 in the Condition supplement in M/08)
So, users have the flexibility to maintian Freight at item level on PO, if the materials used have no freight enetered in the info records or if no info record at all (FRA1/FRB1/FRC1).
Also, users can maintain freight at the PO header level, if applicable for the entire PO. (fra2/frb2/frc2).
In case, there are 4 line items on the PO. One of the material has valid Freight condition in its info record out of the 4 line items. In case of this PO, Freight is applicable at header level only, so the item level freight from info record of this one line item has to be ignored..
{For this, I have made use of Condition exclusion to achieve this}..
Its working fine now.
While testing one scenario I noticed this:
1. Created a PO with 2 line items.
Line item 1- 1* $5496.42
Line item 2- 1* $78.00
2. Freight at header FRB2 = $100.. It correctly gets apportioned to both the line items.
3. Goods receipt done for the above PO.
4. The invoice came in with a slightly different price...So, the PO was changed before posting IR.
5. In the PO, line item 1 changed to 1* $5396.00
line item 2 changed to 1* $80.00
Freight reamins the same..But, when the Net price has been now changed and FRB2 is per value, I imagined FRB2 earlier apportioned to line items will also change as the Net price per line has changed..
Can you please help me understand this behaviour??
Thanks,
Shilpa
↧
Best way to organize materials?
Hello!
We are a make-to-order custom design manufacturer.
Even though almost every one of our finished products is different, and all the materials that go into them are different, they are all "similar."
I know cars are mass-produced, but to use an analogy... wheels are different from car to car, but they all have wheels, same for windows, doors, seats, etc. Imagine we are building one of each different make & model of car. We might want to see "all wheels."
So, I am trying to understand the best field to use to group our materials for analysis and future queries. Would it be material group with hierarchy? Product group (i think not product group)? Or should we be setting up classification with hierarchy?
Thanks very much for your help.
Timothy
↧
Re: Unable to delete PO or clear the GR IR difference for service PO
Hi ;
You can benefit from belowed notes and document to solve your thread:
499575 - FAQ: Invoice verification/goods receipt in service
360481 - Posting logic for quantity and price variance
983769 - MR11: CKMLGRIR 023 for GR-based IV & matl moving avg. price
308008 - FAQ: Posting logic: GR/IR clearing account
http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/logistics-mm/blog/2012/03/08/impact-of-mr11-execution
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal
↧
↧
Re: Header freight apportionment in a PO
Hi,
No need to change the PO price if the freight invoice come with different price. Since its a planned delivery cost, you can directly post the MIRO with correct amount. The same will be adjusted with the GR amount, if sufficient stock is available.
Please post MIRO for planned delivery cost with correct amount and check the material master price as well as price in PO history. (without changing PO).
Regards,
AKPT
↧
Re: Best way to organize materials?
Hi,
Please check the variant configuration concept. You may refer the doc: Introduction to Variant Configuration with an example model
Regards,
AKPT
↧
VAT calculation and Customs duty in Import Purchase China
Hi Friends,
I am configuring import pricing procedure for china.
The calculation is mentioned below...
Gross Price - 100
custom duty - 4 (paid to custom agent)
Vat - 17% on (Gross Price + Custom Duty). VAT is deductibleand paid to custom agent.
Please help on the above scenario.
Please find below my pricing procedure (since it is rollout, i cannot change the pricing procedure structure much). Please help me.
Thanks
Prabhu
↧
Firm zone calculation to be in working days
Hi,
I know that as a SAP standard the calculation of the firm zone and trade off zone is based on calendar days and in not working days. In contrast creation profile works in working days.
I checked various threads in SCN wherein I couldn't find correct answer. Could anybody knows if it is possible to change that, so that firm zone values are based on working days / factory calendar days ? Is there any config or custom code exist?
It would be great help if someone would reply.
Regards,
Sri
↧
↧
Re: Standard price and Moving average price in MM03
Thank your very much for understading my requirement !!
If i delete the current standard cost through CKR1..,are there any impact at costing wise and also i am getting imformation message like below and will it be update as per moving verage price in Materail after deleting standard cost? what about Dont cost check mark? we need to keep or need to remove?
Deleting current standard cost estimates can cause inconsistencies
Message no. CK669
Diagnosis• If you delete a current standard cost estimate, the fields for the cost estimate are set to zero in the material master record. If you use the material ledger, the standard prices in the material ledger master data are also deleted when you delete the current standard cost estimate. The material master record for the material thus does no longer contain a current standard price from a standard cost estimate.
• If you delete an active standard cost estimate, you can no longer determine scrap, work in process and variations for previous periods.
• In certain countries, it is a legal requirement to maintain records of standard pricing. Therefore, you should check whether you are obliged by law to keep records of your standard cost estimates. Please also contact the relevant accounting and inventory management departments.
Thank you!!
Regards
Sudharsana
↧
Re: Header freight apportionment in a PO
All right, All good!
Thanks,
Shilpa
↧
Re: Best way to organize materials?
Check batch management also ,depends on your product will it work or not.Batch management also helps to differentiate the product with minor differences.
↧