THanks Jurgen for the reply. probably i need to ask the TMS provider to see what they did with their previous clients who run SAP, but just thought i will toss the idea around here and see if i can get some info.
Thanks
Ravi
THanks Jurgen for the reply. probably i need to ask the TMS provider to see what they did with their previous clients who run SAP, but just thought i will toss the idea around here and see if i can get some info.
Thanks
Ravi
Hi Gurus,
I have two basic queries.
1. Can info record get updated automatically when I save RFQ via ME47? IF yes, where is the info update button at item level?
2. If I have 4 line items (example) in PR and all are for different vendors and Plant...then can system convert that requsition to PO via ME59N or system will convert only first line item?
Thanks in advance.
we have plants who produce some thousand different materials, everyday there will be new materials. Creating a source list for each of the materials in each other plant would be a kind of overkill (maybe an option if you want punish a user )
A possible solution can be an assignment of a vendor to this plant (if it is not already done), even when you just do intra-company process that does not require a vendor.
Then block this vendor for the purchasing organisation in MK05
When you create a STO, no matter if NB or UB, you will get an error ME022 vendor xxx blocked
Dear DB, thanks for the valuable info, using alias table in the infoset for LFA1 solved my issue, now I can make two joins. Regards
Joining a table multiple times in an infoset is possible using Alias, thats what DB posted. Thanks,
,
Not sure why you want an extra button, SAP takes care when you save, based on the settings made for info update indicator and the SAP special programmed logic (which was numerous times subject to questions - please search in SCN - there is even a FAQ SAP note on that)
What would you call it if you give your son a shopping list with 4 items and he comes back with the first item only ?
I would certainly not think that this is the expected behavior.
Hence you have to analyze why this happened.
And as you already pointed out: "I have two basic queries."
You can certainly find endless discussions on ME59N and even 43 which talk about a check report, hence search with this term: me59n check report
This looks very much like an own development, I would certainly not take this to SAP.
SAP is consistent, if there is a table field identical to a field in the screen then the values are shown 1:1.
there might be more fields in a screen than in the table, those are then computed during runtime.
Your case looks like this "tracking number field" is only used as an output field for some other value.
A programmer should be able to determine at least the program name and then he can check
if there was a modification in your old system e.g. from SE38 via the program versions
or he uses this guide to find the potential exits or BAdIs
Hi All,
Instead of displaying MRKO w.r.t Company level, the user has "Settled". This has resulted in 1000+ documents been settled.
Now, the user has to reverse all the wrongly setlled documents.
I have read through OSS note 356130 and have a write up with me that talks about reversing the the consigfnment stock settlement reversal.
According to what I understand,
1. determine what material document numbers need to be reversed, then reverse them using MBST. Here, my understanding is that if the material documents were created as a result of 411k, you will be able to reverse/cancel using MBST.
When I display the consignment stock that has been settled in error, it contains a mix of 411k and 601k. So, I am not sure if they have to be dealt with, separately... Reason being, if I'm trying to do MBST for a material document that has been a part of 601k earlier, I get the message "Material document cannot be processed".
This is the message:
Message no. M7130
This material
document was generated through the posting of a physical
inventory document, a delivery
via Shipping, or some other automatic movement (such as an order
confirmation in PP or a usage
decision in QM) and cannot be processed with this function.
In this transaction, the system can only cancel a material document if the
latter was created using an Inventory Management transaction.
Cancel the material document in the component that created the document.
You can only reverse the goods movement created through the posting of a
physical inventory document by carrying out a new physical inventory for the
relevant material. You can reverse a delivery effected via Shipping using
transaction VL09.
When I look into the document flow of this material document/delivery from the sales side, I can see that it has been delivered, PGIed, Billed and accounting document cleared..
What should be the process I should be following to reverse all the 1000+ consignment liabilities that has been settled in error?
Any related advice will be appreciated.
Regards,
Shilpa
For 601K movement type documents you need to cancel with VL09 as these documents created once issued the goods to the customer.
Normal Goods receipt one (MIGO) use transaction MBST.
If you want to cancel those settled (Billed and accounting document cleared )check with Finance team are they able to correct anything from Finance side .If they insisted to cancel everything then you need to cancel Billing document ,Reversal PGI then do process again.
To my knowladge ; an accounting document is created when anyone park an invoice.
Can you check FAQ OSS 396051 - FAQ: Parking in the logistics invoice verification ?
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal
Hi ;
You can benefit from documents http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-46495 and Rebate in MM to understand details...
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal
Dear all,
Let me quickly explained my issue.
We have moved to INcoterms FCA, meaning that property transfer is taken when goods are loaded at the vendor site.
No transportation module is implemented. We create an inbounds delivery when receiving info from carrier. And later on, we are receiving against it. Transport module is not implemented.
But we need to post invoice before the Goofs is physically received because of long transportation time.
My questions - I guess it is basic, I am not a MM expert - far from it -
1) Will it be possible to post the invoice against the delivery without the good being physically received.
2) Property of the goods is not yet transfered before receiving - despite the incoterm- Well, I guess so - how the financial posting will work when creating the invoice.
Many thanks for your help.
regards,
Pierre Mikael
Hi Pierre
Have a look at the following KBAs
1674290 - Determining Invoice Posting Values
1962670 - Determining Goods Receipt Posting Values
1915844 - How the system valuates a Goods Receipt for a Purchase Order
You can not post invoice directly with reference to inbound delivery.Once you do goods receipt with reference to inbound delivery the delivery note field updated in Material document.Based on delivery note you can do Invoice.
As per my knowledge before goods receipt only option do invoice against Purchase order.
Hi Friends,,
I have a requirement to implement PO output to be converted to PDF format and sent to vendor as an e-mail attachment.
Can anybody guide me how to. We are on ECC 6.0 Version
Thanks in advance
Bhanu.
Please refer this SAP note
191470 - Purchase order as an e-mail
This is standard scenario and you can use.Are you creating only one generic material to all different manufacturers ?or each manufacture you are creating one circuit breaker ?.For all manufactures one material then you need to identify which supplier items are fast moving .For this either you need to do some enhancement .Each manufacture one material then you can use you said above process.
Hi All,
Request your help on the below requirement regarding GIT (Goods-In-Transit)
We purchase goods from other countries and once the goods are reached port or in transit, we wanted to have an entry with GR like:
Dr. GIT (Goods-in-transit)
Cr. GR.IR Clearing
And when the goods are actually reached in our plant physically, we would like to have an entry like:
Dr. Inventory
Cr. GIT
Our existing scenario is direct post to inventory account and no GIT. Current entry is:
Dr. Inventory
Cr. GR/IR.
Can you pls advice how is possible and technical settings for this pls.
Thank you
Chandu