Hello, you said that u were using FM.
Check your profile update.
Go to trx OF36
Check if you have an entry: Value Type = 60
Please attach screenshots for a better exp.
Regards,
Oswald
↧
Re: System should check budget while parking document
↧
Re: Post goods receipt via EDI on PO with GR-IV flag
Hi,
yes, this is the first time we use IDOCs to post good receipts.
The fileds are, by each segment:
E1BP2017_GM_HEAD_01
| PSTNG_DATE | 20130806 |
| DOC_DATE | 20130806 |
| REF_DOC_NO | TEST |
E1BP2017_GM_CODE
| GM_CODE | 01 |
E1BP2017_GM_ITEM_CREATE
| MATERIAL | 000000000000455551 |
| PLANT | BA11 |
| STGE_LOC | 1001 |
| MOVE_TYPE | 101 |
| ENTRY_QNT | 2 |
| ENTRY_UOM | CS |
| PO_NUMBER | 4550044521 |
| PO_ITEM | 00010 |
| NO_MORE_GR | X |
| MVT_IND | B |
I also tried to add the following:
| REF_DOC_YR | 2013 |
| REF_DOC | 4550044521 |
| REF_DOC_IT | 00010 |
As per a reference in a SAP note related to invoices, but had no luck.
Thank you for your help.
↧
↧
Re: Post goods receipt via EDI on PO with GR-IV flag
This data looks good, and I can post an IDOC with this set of data for a PO with GR-IV active.
the error message you have is usually related to confirmations.
e.g. if a confirmation is mandatory, then you cannot post a GR before the confirmation is entered.
the IDOC routines are little different to the online routines. I suspect you are facing the issue described in this OSS Note 959797 - WMMBXY/MBGMCR/BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE order confirmation
Read the note and check your PO whether you have a confirmation control key active.
do a test, removing confirmation control, and keeping GR-IV, and try to post, I guess it goes through.
↧
Re: Best Practice for Electronic components
help.sap.com has a documentation on material types
You have to know what the items are for you, you could get 5 different recommendations from 5 contributors.
if it is a procured component in a finished good that you manufacture yourself, then it is most likely a raw material.
However, the same material could have a totally different material type e.g. in my company, we sell chemicals, but of course we have a lot electronic parts in our warehouse, in the spare part warehouse for plant maintenance. So in our company such items would be ERSA spare parts.
In general the material types are just a group of characteristics, that define if a material is quantity and value managed, what material master view it has, which fields are optional or mandatory, what number range is used and a few other other things.
↧
Advance Returns Management
We have activated Advance Returns Management for NB doc type. We have done the other required configuration
- Assign delivery type RL to doc type/plant
- create shipping data for plant
- activated the sales view in the material for providing loading group / transportation
- Checked Return vendor flag in vendor master and assigned the customer number
Now when we create the Return PO (by selecting Return check box on line item) I get message "Shipping data for plant required for Advanced Returns PO".
We have tried to look at every piece of configuration that might be causing this error but no luck. Would like to seek help within the SCN community if anybody has experience dealing with this issue.
Thank you
↧
↧
Re: Multiple stock ledgers and financial posting
hi ,
firstly , you can configure MRP based on storage location with MRP AREA.
this shortcut is helpful for you http://scn.sap.com/thread/1472472
I give information about mrp configuration in this link.
M.Ozgur Unal
↧
Re: Packing Insructions in po
hi,
for me , you can benefit from item texts ,but also you can copy this field from MATERIAL MASTER data.It can be more effective.
*add mm01 - purchasing text
*configuration for copy text from mm for PR
*copy text from PR to PO
Conf guide : spro-mm-purchasing- pr or po - text copy control
M.Ozgur Unal
↧
Re: MIGO error with alphanumeric characters in MATNR
hi,
For me, Dont use zeros.
M.Ozgur Unal
↧
Re: Change G/L account in GR for PO Subcontracting Processing
hi,
you need to configure your process. It is so simple , please control SPRO-MM.
M.Ozgur Unal
↧
↧
Re: Net Price changed GR value not showing Correct
hi ,
Is there a problem about first price which is valuated in migo although it is changed ?
M.Ozgur Unal
↧
Re: Order dates
hi ,
ME91 tcode is helpful for this reason. also ME91F ...
M.Ozgur UNAL
↧
How to Remove GR-Based Invoice Verification Not Active from MRRL
Hey Guys,
I have a PO which had the ERS checkbox ticked.
GR-Based Iv was not checked.
A goods Receipt was performed.
The Vendor should not be ERS so the user decided to change the PO to untick ERS after the goods receipt was done.
Now whenever ERS is ran for this Company code, the item appears every time with an error "GR-Based Invoice Verification Not Active".
If an invoice is entered manually or the Material Document is reversed, it still appears.
Is there a way to get rid of this from the ERS log??
↧
Re: Order dates
Hi John,
You can see the expected delivery date in transaction ME2N, when the ALV with results is showed, click on button Delivery Schedule (Shift + F11).
For actual delivery dates (I understand like real delivery dates), you can use transacction MB51.
I hope this help you.
Best regards,
Alejandro Lopez.
↧
↧
Re: Get Vendor number and vendor name by PO number
hi,
ME2L , ME2M , ME2K , ME2N , ME2W can help you.
M.Ozgur Unal
↧
Re: How can i create G/L account field in Migo Screen?
hi,
you can solve this problem with default screen configuration for MIGO.
Rgards
M.Ozgur Unal
↧
LSMW : test run
Hi:
Can we do test run mode when doing for example
Start IDOC processing
Generate IDOC
to make sure all records pass before real production mode?
↧
Re: How to Remove GR-Based Invoice Verification Not Active from MRRL
hi,
this subject contain details of VENDOR MASTER DATA and INFORMATIN RECORDS.
You have to change datas with ME12 and XK02 ..(ers)
M.Ozgur UNAL
↧
↧
How to Remove GR-Based Invoice Verification Not Active from MRRL
you should set the ERS flag again
then do a GR cancellation
then do MRRL
then remove ERS flag
then do the GR again.
↧
Re: mm fi integration issue.
Hi Ragini ;
you can solve your problem with FRC1 condition type on item level of PO.
But , the biggest problem is changable delivery costs.
M.Ozgur Unal
↧
Re: LSMW : test run
Hi,
This is more an ABAP question, it depends of the program, idoc or function module that you are calling from the LSMW.
IDOC processing has its own transaction tool for testing, transaction WE19.
Check this similar thread:
Best regards,
Alejandro López R.
↧