Marco,
As Eduardo said, I also believe that is not possible through customizing.
In my view, if you set up any field as mandatory for tcode MI01 through customizing, you'll impact the Sessions (MI31, MI32, MI33, ...), due to the fact that all of them use MI01 to process the batch input session.
One example is that the field ISEG-GRUND is not avaliable in the MI01.
You should try even SHD0.
Regards,
Fabio
From my point of view is MI01 not at all a transaction to do a physical count in a professional way. It can be used to do a spot count of 1 or 2 items but it is certainly not the tool for a annual count.
It is unfortunately the first thing that is visible in the menu while the real counting transaction hide behind a menu called "Sessions" which does not at all tell a warehouse guy what it means, neither a Newbie to inventory management .
I remember our design phase in 1997 where a team mate scripted this as the standard transaction to create counting sheets, and my warehouse manager called me and asked if we are serious, because the 10 year old legacy system was able to create counting sheets by itself (like Mi31 does).
Anyway, there is no alternative to SHD0 for MI01
why the SubReq demand is created for PD but not for VB MRP types.why the SubReq demand is created for PD but not for VB MRP types. However, the question we have is whether there is a way in configuration to PREVENT the SubReq demand from being created for the PD MRP type
I want when I press the enter on the po line item,the net price can calculat is correct,how can i do?
when I enter RB00 at header level ，not appear this problem，only at item level
This is about the customer specify the vendor. if we use MTS and material hava batch management.
Do we have solution to separate the requirement in MRP result?
Simply you need to remove the group condition tick from this condition type.
Thank you Prabakaran
Thank you Jürgen L
Hi gurus,
We need to use the field EQUI-GROES in MIGO to give an aditional information for Serial Number and after to see in IQ09 report.
( The configuration es MMSL - 03 in OIS2)
The serial number is created automatically and the customer need to add the size of the material. The necessity is to use a "meter" as a measure, but it doesn´t be allowed in Serial Number Management.
Do you known if it available to add field from this table? Do yo have another idea to resolve the requirement?
Thanks in advance
Maria
Dear All,
Has anyone used EAN more that 18 Chars ? ...
Is there any enhancement approach to make it possible?
please suggest...
Thanks and regards,
Nik
Missing functionality says SAP and offers some workarounds in KBA: 1646592 - Health Industry Bar Code (HIBC) field in Material Master (transaction MM01 / MM02)
Thanks Jurgen,
As per KBA 1646592 only option out looks like custom fields as per 44410.
Thanks and regards
Hi All,
I am trying to setup a BOM and subsequently the Subcontracting process for this material. For example we have a material A which is Lamb. We need to give this material to the vendor and the vendor would give us the parts with respect to Lamb for example legs, loin etc. Therefore we would receive these items to our storage location. Can you tell me how do we need to setup the BOM and subsequently create a subcontracting PO to define this process
Regards
Nevin
Hello. I need to know how to configure a STO (or related item) where the resulting accounting entry will be similar to:
Cr Inv in sender location
Automatic intercompany AR / AP entry made via OBYA
Dt Inv in receiving location.
It can use GR/IR, etc as extra entries, but we do not want it to be posted as a sale, but strictly a stock transfer. Please help!
I think SAP has a solution for meat industries - did you try exploring if that meets your requirements?
One option could be to use co-products with your BOM.
Setup the item you buy back as a dummy product as a UNBW product.
All the cuts of meat can be components setup as your co-products
There will be only one true component for the whole lamb.
You will need a cost center for account assignment of the purchase order.
The total cost of the cuts + sub con charges must be more than the component for subcon to work.
Have you tried a standard 2-step STO without delivery with supplying and receiving plants belonging to 2 different companies?
Hi,
You can use the concept of automatic re-order point planning to set the re-order point (min) for the material automatically. Maintain the MRP type as VM, and required lot size in material master. Now, activate the forecast view and check the consumption history in material master - additional data view. If you have consumption history, run the forecast in MP30 for the material, which will eventually reset the re-order point for the material.
Please note that the total replenishment lead time has to be maintained for the material to maintain the re-order point (min). Test the same and revert back.
Regards,
AKPT
I found this post:Re: Posting Amount in Local Currency Using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE
"I konw that I'm digging an old thread but let's have a look. I have the same problrm (filling the DMBTR field from the BAPI). I have not tried yet but checking the code of the BAdI I found that the EXTENSIONIN_TO_MATDOC method of the MB_BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE BAdI is called before creating the material posting and it has the IMSEG table as changing parameter. I will give it a try soon. Hope that it will work.
Has anyone experience with it by any chance?"
Is an option?
What I was suggesting as the FG for your BOM is not the whole lamb but instead a dummy UNBW part called for e.g.: "Cut Lamb 1600lb".
When you do your GR, you would get Cut Lamb 1 EA as 1 value inventory + coproducts as valuated inventory - 1 lamb issued out from SC stock.
The cuts would be independently valuated at their proper value.
The UNBW FG has 0 inventory cost impact.
Since the FG is UNBW you will collect the SC costs in a cost center from your PO.
OR
You could do a FOC subcon PO, take a count from the UNBW inventory of how many items were processed and pay your supplier through a seperate service PO once a month/week.