Check if you have any other postings before or after the date mentioned , find it in MB51 for Material, Plant and Sloc. Whether Freeze book inventory was set or not ? There may be differences because of it.
To rectify you may have to carry out Physical inventory again.
Regards
Irfan
Hi,
You may set the default scope of list based on transaction code in the path: OLME - Reporting- Maintain Purchasing Lists - Scope of List - Define Default Values for Transactions.
For users who need other scope of list as default, you may create a custom transaction (with the same program name) and assign the screen variant as start with variant as explained by Patra. Restrict the usage of the transaction code using authorization methods.
Also refer the KBA: 1913213 - SHD0 : Transaction Variant cannot be created
Regards,
AKPT
Hi Murali,
Did you get help with this BADI? I am also looking for a BADI where I need to set the final invoice indicator for particular PO material group and account assignment category regardless of partial or final invoicing during MIRO.
thanks,
DK
Hi,
You may refer the note: 612011 - No automatic proposal of EREKZ or WEREC which explains the enhancement spot and the method.
Regards,
AKPT
Hi Mates !
I would like to share an issue:
I have the following scenario at Release Strategy at Purchase Requisition:
3 Purchasers
1 Manager
1 Director
If one of 3 pruchasers approve the PR it is not necessary the other 2 ones approve it and follows to the Manager, using Workflow standard.
The PR is going to directly to the 2 other levels ( Manager and Director )
How I should configure it ?
I tried many options but no success.
Thanks for all!
André.
Hi
You can implement BADI-ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST to write custom program under method Item processing or check method
The code should able to validate the entry of confirmation category if it does not match with required category .. then system should give error message.
Thanks,
Jagdeep
Can you configure three release Codes- R1- Creator, R2_ Manager--R3- Director, Workflow will send first message to creator or R1. Then to R2..
Hi Jagdeep,
You mean, one release code for the 3 Purchasers ??
Thank you!
André.
Hello,
I have a line with a trashcan displayed next to it on an active Scheduling Agreement.
I wanted to know if there is a way to undelete a line in a Scheduling Agreement? (either in ME33L, ME32L, ME31L, or somewhere else?)
I know that there is a way to undelete/unblock lines in a Purchase Order (ME22N). But that way does not seem to carry over to Scheduling Agreements.
Any help on this is much appreciated. Please & thank you.
- Eric
Could you further explain a bit. I haven't done a lot of work on tables.
Regards
Moazzam
you will find the undelete function in the EDIT menu
Hi,
Go to SE16 and insert table name as BSEG and insert the selection parameters as below:
1. Purchase order : Not equal to blank.
2. Activity type: (BSEG-VORGN) = RMWE
Execute with other required parameters.
Now, in the output, sort in descending order based on item number (BSEG-BUZEI). You can take the first accounting document after sorting, which will be the accounting document with maximum line item. You can check the corresponding PO number from BSEG itself.
Regards,
AKPT
First of all thanks Dibyendu and Jagdeep for participating in discussion.
Jagdeep, you are correct, Z tcode will load only specific variant not user specific. If I would go for new transaction code then I will have to ask users to use ZME28 (or YME28)only. While rest of the users will use ME28 only.
Other thing is, tomorrow other user can ask some different (other than "ALV"or "ALLES") scope of list to be defaulted, then it will not be possible.
Is there anyway so we can load the variant via parameter. I think it is available for some transaction of SD.
First of all thanks Dibyendu and Jagdeep for participating in discussion.
Jagdeep, you are correct, Z tcode will load only specific variant not user specific. If I would go for new transaction code then I will have to ask users to use ZME28 (or YME28)only. While rest of the users will use ME28 only.
Other thing is, tomorrow other user can ask some different (other than "ALV"or "ALLES") scope of list to be defaulted, then it will not be possible.
Is there anyway so we can load the variant via parameter. I think it is available for some transaction of SD.
Use TAANA transaction, it gives you a summary per aggregation, which means per field in the selection.
Start transaction TAANA. directly click execute.
SAP will ask you for the table, enter ACCTIT .
click the button to select a variant
click Ad-Hoc Variant button
Move the fields you want count from the right to the left
in your case
movement type and item
click okay
the Ad-hoc variant is flagged, just click continue
select online or background depending on the volume of records you have in ACCTIT and click continue
later find your table in the tree on the left, click the variant and see the results on the right
Hi,
You may refer the below note, which explains the system logic:
213765 - @19@ System logic selection Intrastat - arrivals
1112153 - Intrastat declaration of arrivals: Questions and problems
Regards,
AKPT
With the original rules for Intrastat I would say it is almost impossible to match Intrastat with VAT reports. You can approach a difference but I doubt that you ever get a match.
The general way (which may vary from country to country) is :
Especially the last bullet point explains already alone that it cannot match with a VAT report.
You can select yourself in the lower part of transaction MEIS if you run Intrastat with doucment date of posting date.
In any case for an analysis you would need to compare VEIAV tabe entries with the database used for the VAT report, which is certainly not EKBE.
Usual differences arise if SAP is not able to determine a business case as Intrastat relevant (or not Intrastat relevant) .
These differences already start with any invoice (from a vendor of another EU memberstate) for which you do not have formal purchase orders. You get this business into the VAT report based on the invoice, but in purchasing you do not have anything - this would require manual maintenance of VEIAV table through VEFU transaction.
Further you may get invoices from a vendors place in a different EU member state, while your purchase order is just placed with his subsidiary in your own country . Here you would need a GS partner to derive the country of dispatch, which is needed to identify that the goods came from a different country.
And the opposite way will create differences too.
If you order in another EU memberstate, but the invoice is coming from a subsidiary in your own country, and you missed to have the GS partner with your own country in the PO.
Kindly check whether you have made the setting in OMJJ or OMBW because the name in OMBW will be Purchase order and OMJJ will be EBELN. Any way OMBW settings only will impact and i have tested a case.
Regards,
Irfan
You can use the PO number to adopt the data for 541, when to MB1B
click on the " To Purchase Order.." button.Enter movement type 541, Plant, Storage location, PO number and line item.
System will propose the data of BOM components. I think you can save yourself from creating reservation steps.
Thnaks,
Jagdeep