Just saw this recent OSS Notes 2038808. Need to check if it would really help.
2038808 - Error 06042 does not occur when target value exceeded for a contract
↧
Re: Release PO created more than target value in contract
↧
Re: Purchase Requisition gets unreleased during header text changes
Just for records: root cause of the issue was due to a coding bug in service PRs. Got it fixed !
↧
↧
Re: Price editable in ME51N (PR creation)
It was achieved by enhancing at user authorization level. There will be an error message when user tries to change this field value.
Cheers,
Sankar
↧
Re: Service PO line item greyed out
Just for records: not sure about the root cause of the issue. Looks like a lock due to some unknown reason. But issue does not happen anymore.
Cheers,
Sankar
↧
Slipt valuation conflict Batch
hello everyone ,
Our factory produces the chemical material, now we meet a difficult quesiton that is one material can produce different equipments, The Account Department want to value cost to different equipment , but now we just adopt the method that is use different material numbers (same material) to deal with it , but this method take a lot of trouble that is ,Production Department need create a lot of "Same BOM " " recipe" and the same material exists different inventories , how to deal with it , can you give me solution ,thanks
davis
Best&Regard
↧
↧
Re: PO price to update with an update in Info Records
Thanks for your reply. Pls see notes by Jeff G. I apologize for not being clear on the questioning.
↧
Re: PO price to update with an update in Info Records
Thanks Joao, I appreciate your earliest response. I will update how it goes. 
↧
Re: PO price to update with an update in Info Records
Thanks Bijay
↧
Control service vendor via ML33
Hi Gurus,
Please your help with the following. I've entered service conditions in ML33 for a particular activity/vendor. When I create a requisition with the determine source determination flag active, the vendor is effectively derived correctly.
Is there any way to restrict that the PO/PR is created only with a vendor that exists in the service condition list???
Thanks,
↧
↧
Re: PO price to update with an update in Info Records
Hi Joao,
Could you pls validate the below document. Is this what I need to do?
Thanks
Bilal
↧
Re: PO price to update with an update in Info Records
Yes.
↧
PO search by Order Partner
Hi everyone,
Is there a way to search for PO's by Order From Partner (OA vendor)?
I know there is a way to search for PI partners on transaction M2N and use the dynamic selection "Invoicing Party".
But I could not find the relative field for Order from.
Thanks!
↧
Re: Lease and Renting in SAP MM
Dear Niranjan, If we're not sure on something, we shouldn't defer others from replying. I've clearly indicated my MM related requirement in my quarry.
Dear Biju, the process given by you is focusing on invoicing. But my need is to know the MM related process e.g. PO type -- >GI to customer-- > taking material back to own warehouse/stores after job done.
Here Invoice verification will come later. Please detail out the steps on this.
Also since we're dealing with international customers as well, what would be the various commercial steps involve here.
Please detail out the step by step process.
Thanks ...
↧
↧
Re: Lease and Renting in SAP MM
Dear Dennis,
I have never seen customer raising a PO in clients SAP MM module. Customer PO becomes Sales Order for client which is part of Sales Module. If you mean something else you must modify your question to get proper response.
Hope you get answers to all your questions.
Regards,
Niranjan
↧
Error in comparison ME49
Hi,
I´ve used ME49 to compare prices between quotations, but I´ve noticed a error: one of quotation had price $ 10,00, and the other one had $ 12,00.
After process the comparison using ME49, SAP shows as better price 12,00, instead of 10,00?
What can be the problem in this case? What the formule (and tables/fields) used in this comparison?
regards,
Anna Pinheiro
↧
fetching PO changes relevant for given version
Hi Gurus,
We activated Version management for Purchase orders & all relevant settings are done to capture the changes & display them on PO print.
But the problem is, when we print the PO, changes done with all versions are being displayed every time.i.e.
lets say there is PO no: XXXX. & initial version no:0
then we did some changes to PO & now version no:1
then further modified the PO & now version no:2.
When we print the PO displaying changes, system is showing all changes done from version no:0 to 2. Actually system should show only changes between version no 1 & 2.
we are using SAP FM:ME_READ_CHANGES_EINKBELEG
please suggest a logic to fetch changes between latest version to last version.
Thanks in advance
↧
Re: negative stock in transit
Hi
See note 935755 - Negative stock even though it is not allowed in Customizing
"The negative stock can be eliminated only by reversing a goods issue or by
posting a different goods issue."
To cancel the incorrect 315 posting, you can TEMPORARILY allow negative stocks in OMJ1 for the relevant plant and storage location and in MM02 for the relevant material. Post the cancellation to create positive stock in transfer. Change back the settings in OMJ1 and MM02.
I hope this can help
Anna
↧
↧
Re: Error During transfer Posting( Please specify an internal number range)
Dear D P,
Please try these Transactions
OMC1
Please check it.And also also try these transactions-FBN1, OMBT
Regards,
Manjunath B L
↧
Re: negative stock in transit
Hi,
In addition, refer the KBA: 1800451 - No link between the documents of a two step stock transfer (with movment types 303/313 and 305/315).
Regards,
AKPT
↧
Re: Standard report without Cost
Hi R G, in case of MB51, you can set this report in cuztomizing in SPRO-->F5-->Materials Management-->Inventory Management and Physical Inventory-->Reporting-->Define Field Selection for Material Document List
In this way you can set if any field of MKPF or MSEG Table to show on Selection Screen or on Output Field, and you can set blank on the check mark "Output field" for the field MSEG EXBWR Externally Entered Posting Amount in Local Currency, and the MB51 not show this field again but any user.
In other hand maybe you check with a BASIS the Authority Checks of Transactions in SU24 and maybe have a chance to block that type information.
↧